Children of the Living Dead DVD Review

Children of the Living Dead is the story of Abbott Hayes, a convicted serial murderer and rapist that was killed in prison and arose from the dead to kidnap children and lead a legion of zombies against people that want to build an auto-mall in place of the cemetery across from his old home. Years after being kidnapped, the children are killed by zombie Abbott Hayes while on their way to a concert, only to rise from the dead as part of his legion of zombies. The construction crew keep finding mysterious things that are happening to the bodies at the cemetery; bodies missing, evidence of live burial. Is this the work of the fabled Abbott Hayes or just vandals and miscreants?
Any way you slice it, this movie is a travesty of cinema. The Night of the Living Dead 30th Anniversary Edition is supposed to be a prequel to this movie, with the Cemetery Zombie (Bill Hinzman) being Abbott Hayes.
Tom Savini starts out the film as a zombie hunter creatively dispatching zombies with a fine array of fire arms and other improvised techniques. This is all made incredibly goofy by the over-dubbing of simple dialog that could have easily been inner monologue. Since Tom’s mouth isn’t moving, it comes across like the mumblings of Popeye. In fact, the first half of the movie has an exceeding amount of over-dubbed dialog that sometimes obviously doesn’t fit with what’s being shown on screen. There are times when the teenagers look like they are talking and even motioning with their hands, yet the dialog had already stopped long before. Most of this over-dubbed dialog happens while the characters faces are not necessarily shown on screen and comes off as dialog that the ”Mystery Science Theater 3000” cast would be interjecting or something from Kung Pow: Enter the Fist. These are all obvious attempt to “fix” the film in post production, but given that these are all tactics used by comedic groups to deride certain works, it comes off as making a jokes of itself.
There are certain things about the movie that just don’t add up. When the teenagers die, there is a funeral for them. You see their 5 caskets lined up and people standing around them mourning. There is a service, after which everyone departs while the caskets stay lined up and above the ground. I haven’t been to too many funerals, but every one of them, and every one I’ve seen on screen, ends which the casket being lowered into the ground, not just left out to rot. Why would they leave them out like this? Because it makes it easier for the grave robbers to come take their jewelry like it says in the script.
There’s a scene in a diner where Matthew, the son of the man building the auto-mall, goes to see Laurie, the young waitress that has tickled his fancy. He sits down and orders a cup of coffee from her as they chat. Before he even sips the coffee she gives him, she takes the cup away and replaces it with a fresh one and pours another cup. Before he even sips that one, she refills it. Before he even sips the second one, she refills it again. He ends up leaving having never even tasted one of the four cups of coffee that she served.
During the big zombie fight scene at the end, which looks more like a bar brawl scene that should have taken place in the movie Roadhouse, Laurie hides in the store room of the diner while Matthew goes to fight the zombie hordes. She’s left with a handgun and a flashlight. When the power goes out, she fumbles to make the flashlight work. When it does, Abbott Hayes is there, growling in her faces. She screams and cowers on the floor. Suddenly he’s gone and she ventures out of the store room to be attacked by other zombies and subsequently saved by the Sheriff who is able to gun down 6 zombies with 2 shots from the hip. What was that all about?
I really could go on all day about this movie. The fact that it was created with the help of many of the people who made the original Night of the Living Dead is definitely saddening. Tor Ramsey, director of Children of the Living Dead, issued this letter of apology for his involvement with the film along with an account of what he believes went wrong with it. When we saw John Russo at the Flashback Weekend horror convention in Chicago, Nate asked him about Children of the Living Dead in a polite side conversation and he refused to talk about it. I believe that these to things speak mountains about the quality of this film.
Despite all of this, I recommend that everyone with a love for the zombie genre check out this movie, preferably on the cheap, just to see how low it can go. My ceaseless bitching about this movie could never do justice to describing just how bad it is. You really ought to see for yourself.
Comments(4)



LMAO Even Russo won’t talk about it! That is baaaaaaaaaaaaaaad…..
I have to say that this is one of those films that you forget about for 8 years, see it and forget it another 12 1/2. There are so many things wrong with this film:
1. Any zombie film has taught us that zombies aren’t all that strong. So, why the fuck is Abbott Hayes able to lift people four feet from the ground and punch holes into their stomaches?
2. In order for the infection to spread, the infected saliva of the dead must enter a flowing blood source, why was Abbott able to bring the other five people back from the dead. Key word: DEAD.
3. What’s with Abbott’s walk?
4. Seriously, what’s with his walk?
5. Even this makes no sense. If Abbott is still alive, then there are others that are capable of turning into the living dead. Why did he need to bite the dead for them to come back? Shouldn’t they have already returned even after the crash killed them?
6. I mean it man. Seriously, WHAT’S WITH ABBOTT’S WALK!?!?!?!?!?!?
7. This is moreso a sequel to RETURN OF THE LIVING DEAD, The film takes place during the events of that film, and yes it mentions the NIGHT film but still, it’s moreso a sequel to RETURN than it is to NIGHT.
I give this film half of one flamezilla out of five. Tor A. Ramsy, that film is not all that good. That’s why your ass got canned!
Listen to the reviewer this film is beyond awful. I dont even know where to begin. We’ll start by saying never before have I watched a feature length film in such a short time…that’s because I spent half the film ast forwarding through the movie. first off I love Tom Savini; however frankly the way the film was cut they could have completely done this entire film without him, really the entire first 40 minutes of the film have absolutely no bearing on the story it seems. The whole 1st half of the film could have been summed up in probably 5 minutes and saved a ton of money on filming (and not have wasted my time). And boy if anyone out there can find any cohesion or make any sense of that plot whatsoever I have a crisp $100 bill with your name on it…Hell Ill be your slave for a month if you can explain this movie clearly to me. You could tell all the actors were hired locally (which isn’t always a bad thing), they all looked like actors from a cheap injury attorney commercial. The production values were worse than even some of my middle school projects. The tone of the film was completely obscure; you couldn’t tell if this was supposed to be funny, or a serious effort, or what the hell was happening which needless to say is not good. At least some low budget productions make an effort to be tongue-in-cheek, but it was rather evident that the writer had no experience at all in creating atmosphere. The dialogue was soooo long and boring and unnecessary. And when I say unnecessary i mean really without cause, there were just snippets of scenes and dialogue which didn’t move the story at all. It was a few months ago that I watched this film and I actually find myself getting angry writing this review. Just people talking for no reason about absolutely nothing. Typically I shy away from writing reviews, leaving commentary and the like, but this movie was sooooo bad I simply could not remain silent. I am off now to go beat up a little kid just to take out my frustration.
Oh yea I forgot…There is no explanation whatsoever for the Zombies…Now I dont mean like in Dawn of the Dead (1968, or 2008) where they dont really explain their origins, but rather there presence is simply inexplicable. Are the dead rising because of abbot hayes, or all the dead rising, only some or what. God just dumb, dumb, dumb.